The Borough Of Brentwood, England Be Considered A...

To what extent can the borough Of Brentwood, England Be Considered a Sustainable Community? Subject- Geography Topic- Sustainability Introduction Sustainability is currently a global concern. In recent years scientists have publicised theories that the Earth will not be able to cope with the exponential growth of pollution and resource consumption. At present there are many examples of areas that have made their communities sustainable as a result of the UN millennium goal. These goals stated†¦One example is Milagro. This is a community in Arizona that has recently become sustainable. It is known for its cohousing community of twenty-eight, energy efficient, passive solar homes. I have chosen to perform my tests in Brentwood as it is a developed, affluent area. As a result of this its public transport networks are large, its resource consumption is high and its houses are large. Further, Brentwood is an area that shows an even distribution of wealth, preventing anomalies. Research Question/ Hypothesis †¢ The research question I have chosen to investigate is â€Å"In what ways can we agree that the town of Brentwood, England, is a sustainable area?† †¢ The hypothesis I will be trying to prove/disprove is â€Å"Through the Sustainability Communities Index it is apparent that Brentwood is a sustainable town†. The Sustainable Communities Index The Sustainable Communities Index is a system of indicators for livable, equitable and prosperous cities. It isShow MoreRelatedOpportunities23827 Words   |  96 PagesStarbucks brand was not based on mass advertising or promotion. It was based, Schultz believed, on their experience in company stores: on their reactions to the coffee, the people who made and served it, and the stores’ atmosphere and sense of community. This experience, he said, â€Å"earned customers’ trust by speaking to their hearts as well as their heads.†9 As they debated international expansion in 1995 and 1996, he and other managers were fairly confident that the appeal of the Starbucks brand

Wal Marts Ethical Issues - 1616 Words

Although prices at Wal-Mart are considered as reasonable they are still having their own issues in relation to ethical issues and unethical practices consists of consumers were complaining about how they were not paying what they consider a fair prices for their groceries. Wal-Mart use to cover up what they were doing to their customers the advocate group followed the Food Chain Workers Alliance in order to investigate the root of the problem in the outsourcing ethical systems. Wal-Mart worker are currently complaining they are not being treated fairly because they are overworking their employees and they are not receiving enough pay based on their skills and qualifications they should determine how qualified their employees are for the job of their choice. Wal-Mart just followed existing law. Since the central contradiction of corporate social responsibility ethics is reduced to a matter of noblesse oblige, not human rights. Wal-Mart have been breaking the labor in which it is unethical practices because the labor department felt they were not being treated properly and the customer felt they were not giving the right quality of merchandise in which they paid for. According to report all outlets along with the suppliers are to fully abide to the law regulations in relation to the immigration labor, safe environment health. Wal-Mart was founded in 1962 in Arkansas by a mean named Roger’s Sam in 2002 Wal-Mart had become a very popular store for consumers to shop howeverShow MoreRelatedThe Ethics of the Wal-Mart Model887 Words   |  4 PagesThe Ethics of the Wal-Mart Model There are many opinions on the ethics of the Wal-Mart model, both favourable and unfavourable. The article â€Å"ROB Ranks Wal-Mart Among Canada’s Best Employers† (McLachlan, 2009, pg. 287) offers a favourable viewpoint of the model, and the article â€Å"The Cost of Walmartization† (McLachlan, 2009, pg. 288) offers an opposing unfavourable view. This paper discusses the theoretical approaches used in each article, along with the supporting evidence that was used in anRead MoreCompany Background Of Wal Mart Essay987 Words   |  4 Pages 1. Company Background Wal-Mart is a multinational retail company, which operates a chain of rebate department stores in American. The company was founded by Sam Walton in 1962 and incorporated on Ocober31, 1969 and it has more than 11000 stores in 27 countries. In 1972, New York Stock Exchange listed the company in their special column. Obviously, there are three divisions into the operations of Wal-Mart: Wal-Mart International, Wal-Mart U.S., and Sam’s Club. On the other hand, the companyRead MoreWal-Marts Values1574 Words   |  7 PagesExploring the World Wide Web -Go to Wal-Mart’s web site www.walmart.com and read the information there about the company’s stance on the ethics of Global Outsourcing and the treatment of workers in countries abroad. Then search the Web for some recent stories about Wal-Mart’s global purchasing practices and reports on the enforcement of its code of conduct. I. â€Å"Brief† Summary of the exercise Wal-Mart was founded back in 1962 by Sam Walton who instilled values and the three basic beliefs thatRead MoreMoral Ethics Of Business Entities Toward Society1496 Words   |  6 PagesIntroduction The purpose of this documentary study is to analyze the ethical and moral action of Wal-Mart, one of the biggest retailer corporations in the United States, towards society and its employee. The â€Å"Wal-Mart: The High Cost of Low Price† is a documentary movie directed by Robert Greenwald and released in the market on November 4, 2005. Being the biggest competition of the retail industry toward the small local business owner, Wal-Mart claims to be one of the reasons why local small businessesRead MoreEth 316 Company Code of Ethics1035 Words   |  5 PagesCompany Code of Ethics Company Code of Ethics Wal-Mart was started over fifty years ago in Arkansas and within those fifty years has emerged into the largest retailer in the world. Wal-Mart operates in many countries with thousands of stores and millions of employees. One reason for Wal-Mart’s is the value and hard work they put into upholding their code of ethics. Wal-Mart has three basic beliefs – respect for the individual, service to their customers, and striving for excellence. Of theRead MoreCross Cultural Perspectives1102 Words   |  5 PagesCross Cultural Perspectives Cross Cultural Perspectives Wal-Mart is one of the largest corporations and private employers in the United States, and one of the most admired companies in America as reported by Fortune Magazine (â€Å"Fortune 500†, 2012). Netting billions of dollars in profits each year, there are not many other retailers who can compete with them. They give millions back in donations to non-profit companies around the country each year, yet put mom-and-pop establishments out ofRead MoreWal-Mart: The Challenge of Making Relationships with Stakeholders1218 Words   |  5 Pages 1. Evaluate how Wal-Mart has ranked and responded to various stakeholders. 2. Why do you think Wal-Mart has had a recent number of ethical issues that have been in the news almost constantly? 3. What do you think Wal-Mart could do to develop an improved ethical culture and respond more positively to its diverse stakeholders? Question 1 Many groups have a stake in what Wal-Mart does. Stakeholders can be broken down into two diverse groups: market stakeholders (shareholders, employeesRead MoreWalmarts Success Driven by Control Mechanisms1194 Words   |  5 PagesControl mechanisms are used by organizations to help standardize processes which contribute to overall company goals. Wal-Mart is a large business working to meet the needs of its customers, employees and suppliers by incorporating controls; controls consists of market control, clan control, manager audits, and performance standards. Each control is significant to effectively thrive in the business world; additionally, increasing customer, employee and supplier confidence. The effectiveness of eachRead MoreUnethical Business Practices by Wal-Mart Essay626 Words   |  3 PagesIf Wal-Mart has such little regard for their own employees, it would make it difficult for a company to have minimal regard to where their merchandise is coming from. On the documentar y, The High Price of Low Cost, informs of the countries and Wal-Mart’s effects on these countries, including its presence for manufacturing in China. The workers work in conditions of extreme temperatures from morning until dawn and provided boarding, which is shared with several others and lined with bunk beds. TheRead MoreCurrent Ethical Issue in Business1476 Words   |  6 PagesCurrent Ethical Issue in Business Your Name Here PHL/323 Date Here Instructor’s Name Here Globally, Wal-Mart is the second largest revenue generating company. It is surprising to see so many discriminating issues within the company. Women working for the company are consistently treated unfairly, yet other issues exist. It is as if Wal-Mart has fallen into the negative economic routine. The company is guilty of everyday social discrimination;

Synthesizer Free Essays

To make this synth, I opened up the ES2 synthesizer in Logic, changed the setting to â€Å"series†, turned on â€Å"poly’ and made sure it was in â€Å"unison† and opened up a second and third waveform. Next, I split the waveforms evenly using the acute triangle fgure. I set a cutoff to 1 and 2, and used envelope 2 for the cutoff. We will write a custom essay sample on Synthesizer or any similar topic only for you Order Now Finally, I turned both cut settings all the way to the right†¦ from this I got an upbeat dance- style synth that I’d be happy to use on any dancepop/electro track that I was trying to create! Synth 2 For this next tutorial, I wanted to have synthesized drums, so I made a basic drum pattern in ultrabeat opened up the ES2 synthesizer. The first thing I did once I had the ES2 synthesizer open was change the default preset to plain sine. Next, shorten the attack significantly. Then, I shortened to the decay to a little less than half, took away all of the sustain, then shortened the release to about 1/6. Then, I changed the settings so that the pitch will be modulated by envelope 2. After, I turned on the filter nd set the drive to about 0. 10 to give some realistic harmonics. Finally, I set the sine level up a bit to give a bit more of a bass sound and voila! The perfect synth percussion to add to a db or rap track. Synth 3 For synth number three, I set out to make a house/techno-type synthesizer. I opened up my ES2 synthesizer. First, I set the first channel to sine and right clicked down to number 59 â€Å"cryl† and lowered the channel to -17s. Next I enabled the second channel, put it on a saw tooth and lowered it to -24. Next I enabled the third hannel, went to sine and set it up to â€Å"vox3† and set this one to -36s. Brought the icon in the triangle to the center so the sounds are balanced, then turned the analog halfway up. I went to the top and set it to ono and brought the voices down to 4, set the distortion to about 13. 600db. Finally, I routed envelope 1 to cutoff 2 and set cutoff 2 down to O. Lastly, I set the decay up, however, I also like it when I set the decay all the way down, yet still making for a delightfully electronic sound that would fit any good house/techno track! Synth History Perhaps the first fully electronic instrument came along Just before the turn of the 20th century, in 1899, when William Duddell took technology used in the carbon arc lamp, which was known for making a lot of noise, from a high-pitched whistle down to a low hum. Duddell had the lamp examined and his workers cuncluded that the more voltage the lamp received, the higher the pitch of the sound it gave off would be. Duddell hooked a keyboard up to the lamp and tentatively titled it, â€Å"The Singing Arc†, thus birthing the first fully-functional electronic instrument! How to cite Synthesizer, Papers

Immigration and Border Protection Interpretation Adopted by the Court

Question: Discuss about the Immigration and Border Protection forInterpretation Adopted by the Court. Answer: 1. The decision given in this case has very significant implications, particularly when it comes to partner visa. In this case, the unanimous decision of the Full Court was that no temporal limitation is present regarding when the persuasive conditions which have been relied upon for the Schedule 3 waiver should be present. In this context, the court stated that the proper interpretation of sub-clause 820.211(2)(d)(ii) will be that the court can consider the compelling circumstances without taking into account, when these circumstances have taken place. The implication is that the Department as well as Tribunal is not restricted to considering the persuasive circumstances that were present when the application was made. They can consider the circumstances that were arisen after the making of the application and should take these circumstances, into account. The opinion of the Court in this case was since the purpose behind the discretion of the Minister not to apply a Schedule 3 waiv er (or in other words, to waive) Schedule 3, has been provided to the Minister for the purpose of greater flexibility in case of convincing circumstances and, for instance, with a view to evade the hardships faced by the applicants, it will be not be consistent with such a purpose if an interpretation is adopted that the circumstances that can be considered are only the circumstances that were present at some time in the past. The opinion of Dowsett J in this case was that the circumstances that can be banked on for justifying the use of discretion of not applying Schedule 3 must not be restricted, in view of the nonexistence of statutory requirements. Similarly, sub-clause 820.211(2)(d)(ii) does not contain any requirement which places a restriction on the matter is that can be considered as compelling as being only the matter is that were present at the time when the application for partner visa was made. The reasoning of Griffith J was that the authority to dispense with or to waive the requirements prescribed by Schedule 3, is not in itself a criterion of Part 822 Schedule 2. Consequently, in his opinion, the title appearing on laws 820.21 which is the Criteria to be satisfied at time of application cannot be said is having the effect of restraining the consideration of the decision-maker of whether the convincing circumstances were present regarding the matters that were in existence when the application was made. The waiver power that has been mentioned in sub-clause 8320.211(2)(d)(ii) have been mentioned in terms that the Minister is satisfied that compelling reasons are present or not applying Schedule 3 and therefore, it can be implied that the waiver power can be used at the time of the decision regarding the grant of visa and therefore the matters that can be taken into consideration should extend not only to the matters that existed when the application was made but also the matters existing at the time of decision. As the intention behind the introduction of the waiver power was to lessen difficulties, it was important that clear words should be used in the law and principles, restricting the matters that can be considered and as no such language is present, it will not be appropriate to interpret the regulations as restricting the reasons that can be taken into account only the circumstances that existed when the application was made. There is nothing in the Explanatory Statement to the amendments introducing Clause 820.211(2)(d)(ii) that indicates that the circumstances that have been relied upon while seeking a waiver of Schedule 3 should be present when the application is made. In this way, this is where the significance of this decision lies. It was unanimously held by the Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia that these provisions do not result in implementing a temporal limitation of compelling and compassionate grounds relied upon when the waiver of Schedule 3 criteria is being considered. Therefore, while integrating the provision mentioned in sub-clause 820.211(2)(d), it was decided by the court that the effect of these compelling and compassionate circumstances will be carried through while the application is being evaluated, and not merely when the application was made. In this way, the effect of this decision is that the Department and the Tribunal under an obligation to consider the circumstances of the applicant that would present when they evaluate the application. Under these circumstances, it can be said that the effect of this decision is to expand the grounds that can be relied upon by the applicants when they are applying for the waiver of Schedule 3. At the same time, another impact of this decision is that it increases the chances for the applicant to remain on shore during the processing of the application. Moreover, it can also be said that this decision will also have a retrospective effect regarding the previous cases by relying on the compelling circumstances that were present at the time of the decision and not merely the circumstances that were present when the application was made. Therefore, despite its current policy, the Department as well as the Courts and Tribunals are required to follow this decision (till the time when the decision has been subsequently overruled by the High Court). The effect is that while deciding the issue of waiving the criteria mentioned in Schedule 3, a much wider scope of circumstances is present that have to be considered by the decision-makers while evaluating the applications. In this way, the decision has significant implications, particularly in case of partner visa. 2. In this case, the Full Court relied upon the principles of statutory interpretation to arrive at the conclusion that the provisions of sub-clause 820.211(2)(d)(ii) have to be interpreted in such a way that the compelling circumstances related with the waiver of schedule 3 can be considered without regard to the fact that when these circumstances have taken place. For this purpose, the court applied the golden rule of statutory interpretation and therefore, while integrating these statutory provisions, it was held by the court that the effect of the compelling circumstances on the basis of which, the waiver of Schedule 3 has been claimed in the application, will be carried through the period during which the application is being evaluated and not only the time when the application was made. As a result of this interpretation, it is required that the Department and the Tribunal are required to consider the circumstances of the applicant when they are evaluating the application and n ot merely the circumstances that were present when the application was made. In this regard, the Migration Regulations, 1994 provide in sub-clause 820.211(2)(d)(ii) that the requirement of criteria described in Schedule 3 can be waived only if the Department believes that compelling reasons exist for not applying the criteria. However, according to the common practice adopted by the Department and also by the Tribunal in the past, only the requirement of the criteria was considered that existed when the relevant application was made. The effect was that any circumstances that were brought to the notice of the Department or the Tribunal as affecting the situation of the applicants after the application has been lodged were not considered while assessing the application. However the effect of the approach regarding statutory interpretation that was adopted by the Full Court in this case was that the court came to the conclusion that the legislation has not imposed a temporal limitation regarding compelling circumstances while considering the waiver of the criteria mentioned in Schedule 3. Therefore, while interpreting this particular legislative provision, it was decided by the court that the impact of compelling circumstances can be considered throughout the period when the application is being evaluated and not only the circumstances that were present when the application for the waiver of Schedule 3 criteria was made. The effect of this approach of statutory interpretation adopted by the court was that the Department as well as the Tribunal is required to evaluate the circumstances that are present when the application is being assessed. It was also stated by the court that a limitation was not imposed by the legislative requirement regarding the relevant time, when it was examined in the criteria was satisfied. On the other hand, it was held that the waiver power can be used by the Minister at his discretion. Adopting the golden rule of statutory interpretation, the court stated that the waiver power has been granted with a view to alleviate hardship and to allow the applicants to have their cases evaluated individually, in accordance with their personal circumstances. As there was no express provision present, which limited the existence of compelling circumstances only been the application was made, rejecting the relevant compelling circumstances that arise when the application was assessed wil l be erroneous. Reference Waensila v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCAFC 32